Schindler's List currently dominates Coco 69–31
Who do you think should win?
The Verdict Decade Duel
This matchup has 16 votes. The picture may shift as more people weigh in.
The 24-year divide makes this a referendum on staying power. Does Schindler's List still resonate, or has Coco surpassed it? Across 16 votes, Schindler's List leads this matchup 69% to 31%.
Schindler's List carries the weight of its era — a different pace, different expectations, different audience. Coco arrives from a world that had already absorbed those lessons, and the vote reveals which approach ages better.
The gap speaks for itself: Schindler's List at 69%, Coco at 31%. 37.6 points of daylight.
The Numbers
| Schindler's List | Coco | |
|---|---|---|
| Head-to-Head | 69% | 31% |
| Overall Win Rate | 46% | 58% |
| Championships | 7 | 8 |
| Budget | $22M | $175M |
| Return | 14.6x | 4.7x |
Coco has the stronger overall record on BingeBracket at 58% to 46%. Against most opponents, it wins more — just not against Schindler's List.
Where This Matchup Sits
Coco sits at #9 in Family among 37 on BingeBracket.
Looking at shared opponents, Interstellar stands above both of them on the platform. For all their differences, neither film can get past it.
Despite the lopsided head-to-head, the tournament records are competitive: Schindler's List with 7 titles, Coco with 8. The broader record is tighter than this specific matchup.
Schindler's List (1993) returned 14.6x its budget while Coco (2017) managed 4.7x. With 24 years between them, ROI is a fairer comparison than raw grosses — and Schindler's List wins the bracket too.
Choosing Schindler's List takes 2.3s on average. Choosing Coco takes 7.6s. That gap suggests they're doing different things for their voters.
Where to Watch
Availability may vary by region.
Want to pit Schindler's List against something else?
Build your own bracket with any films you want.