Pulp Fiction currently dominates Reservoir Dogs 71–29
The masterpiece outperforms the debut — Pulp Fiction's scale leads.
Who do you think should win?
The Verdict Director's Cut
Jules reciting Ezekiel before the execution, the adrenaline needle in Mia's chest, Vincent and Mia at Jack Rabbit Slim's — Pulp Fiction contains five or six sequences of the quality Dogs achieves with its best two. Tarantino's 1994 film doesn't just expand on Dogs' principles; it multiplies them, proving that the debut's methods could sustain a two-and-a-half-hour film with multiple storylines without losing a beat. The lead says multiplication outperforms concentration. The film with more great scenes wins over the one with fewer, even when the fewer are perfect.
The Numbers
| Reservoir Dogs | Pulp Fiction | |
|---|---|---|
| Head-to-Head | 29% | 71% |
| Overall Win Rate | 57% | 56% |
| Championships | 17 | 65 |
| Avg Decision | 2.4s | 2.5s |
| Budget | $1M | $8M |
| Box Office | $3M | $214M |
Where This Matchup Sits
Both sit mid-table among 50 films from the 1990s on BingeBracket — similar decade standing.
Looking at Quentin Tarantino's 8 films on BingeBracket, Reservoir Dogs ranks #2 and Pulp Fiction ranks #3.
The championship record tells the same story: Pulp Fiction has 65 tournament wins to Reservoir Dogs's 17. The pedigree gap matches the head-to-head gap.
Pulp Fiction cost $8M to make and grossed $214M. Reservoir Dogs was made for $1M and earned $3M. The commercial gap carries over — Pulp Fiction wins the head-to-head too.
Where to Watch
Availability may vary by region.
Want to pit Pulp Fiction against something else?
Build your own bracket with any films you want.