Inglourious Basterds currently beats Django Unchained 56–44
The WWII revenge film edges out the antebellum one — Waltz the difference.
The Verdict Director's Cut
Christoph Waltz won the Oscar for Basterds and then won it again for Django, and the gap between those performances tells you everything about why Basterds leads at 56 to 44. Landa is a creation — unpredictable, multilingual, capable of switching from warmth to menace mid-sentence. King Schultz is a vehicle — charming, functional, designed to guide Django and the audience through the mechanics of the plot. Tarantino gave Waltz a character to inhabit in 2009 and a character to perform in 2012. Both are watchable. Only one is unforgettable. The farmhouse scene alone is worth more than any single sequence in Django.
The Numbers
| Inglourious Basterds | Django Unchained | |
|---|---|---|
| Head-to-Head | 56% | 44% |
| Overall Win Rate | 52% | 35% |
| Championships | 6 | 0 |
| Avg Decision | 1.4s | 1.3s |
| Budget | $70M | $100M |
| Box Office | $321M | $425M |
Where This Matchup Sits
In Drama on BingeBracket: Inglourious Basterds is in the upper half and Django Unchained languishing near the bottom, out of 88 films.
Among Quentin Tarantino's 8 films on BingeBracket, Inglourious Basterds sits at #3 and Django Unchained at #7.
Looking at shared opponents, Kill Bill: Vol. 1 stands above both of them on the platform. For all their differences, neither film can get past it.
Championship experience heavily favors Inglourious Basterds with 6 titles. Whether that translates to head-to-head dominance is what this matchup answers.
Where to Watch
Availability may vary by region.
Want to pit Inglourious Basterds against something else?
Build your own bracket with any films you want.