Evangelion: 3.0+1.0 Thrice Upon a Time currently dominates Weapons 79–21
Anno's franchise conclusion overwhelms Cregger's horror follow-up.
The Verdict Genre Clash
This matchup has 14 votes — still early. The picture may shift as more people weigh in.
Anno's closing Rebuild film carries twenty-six years of accumulated mythology — the Instrumentality sequence, the deconstruction of animation itself, Shinji choosing to exist in an imperfect world rather than retreat into a perfect fantasy — and that accumulated weight is an advantage no standalone can replicate. Cregger's Weapons extends the spatial-horror instincts he built in Barbarian, the architecture-as-threat principle applied with growing confidence. Both directors are working from established foundations. The gap says the foundation built across a quarter-century outperforms the one built across a single predecessor. Anno's mythology outweighs Cregger's architecture.
The Numbers
| Evangelion: 3.0+1.0 Thrice Upon a Time | Weapons | |
|---|---|---|
| Head-to-Head | 79% | 21% |
| Overall Win Rate | 65% | 63% |
| Championships | 13 | 14 |
| Budget | $30M | $38M |
| Box Office | $94M | $270M |
Where This Matchup Sits
Both are top-ten films from the 2020s on BingeBracket — Evangelion: 3.0+1.0 Thrice Upon a Time at #3, Weapons at #5 out of 43.
Despite the lopsided head-to-head, the tournament records are competitive: Evangelion: 3.0+1.0 Thrice Upon a Time with 13 titles, Weapons with 14. The broader record is tighter than this specific matchup.
Weapons was the bigger hit commercially ($270M vs $94M), but Evangelion: 3.0+1.0 Thrice Upon a Time wins head-to-head. Ticket sales and bracket instinct don't always agree.
Where to Watch
Availability may vary by region.
Want to pit Evangelion: 3.0+1.0 Thrice Upon a Time against something else?
Build your own bracket with any films you want.