Evangelion: 3.0+1.0 Thrice Upon a Time currently dominates Weapons 79–21
Anno's franchise conclusion overwhelms Cregger's horror follow-up.
Who do you think should win?
The Verdict Genre Clash
This matchup has 14 votes. The picture may shift as more people weigh in.
Anno's closing Rebuild film carries twenty-six years of accumulated mythology — the Instrumentality sequence, the deconstruction of animation itself, Shinji's relationship with Gendo carrying the weight of every prior entry's unresolved tension — and that accumulated weight is an advantage no standalone can replicate. Cregger's Weapons extends the spatial-horror instincts he built in Barbarian, the architecture-as-threat principle applied with growing confidence. Both directors are working from established foundations. The gap says the foundation built across a quarter-century outperforms the one built across a single predecessor. Anno's mythology outweighs Cregger's architecture.
The Numbers
| Evangelion: 3.0+1.0 Thrice Upon a Time | Weapons | |
|---|---|---|
| Head-to-Head | 79% | 21% |
| Overall Win Rate | 65% | 66% |
| Championships | 13 | 17 |
| Budget | $30M | $38M |
| Box Office | $94M | $270M |
Where This Matchup Sits
Both are top-ten films from the 2020s on BingeBracket — Evangelion: 3.0+1.0 Thrice Upon a Time at #5, Weapons at #3 out of 43.
Despite the lopsided head-to-head, the tournament records are competitive: Evangelion: 3.0+1.0 Thrice Upon a Time with 13 titles, Weapons with 17. The broader record is tighter than this specific matchup.
On similar budgets ($30M vs $38M), Weapons grossed $270M while Evangelion: 3.0+1.0 Thrice Upon a Time made $94M. But Evangelion: 3.0+1.0 Thrice Upon a Time wins the bracket matchup despite earning less.
Where to Watch
Availability may vary by region.
Want to pit Evangelion: 3.0+1.0 Thrice Upon a Time against something else?
Build your own bracket with any films you want.