Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire currently beats Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince 61–39
The franchise's first death edges out its most atmospheric entry.
Who do you think should win?
The Verdict Franchise Civil War
Newell's Goblet of Fire has the advantage of introducing stakes the franchise hadn't risked before — Cedric's death in the graveyard is the moment Harry Potter stopped being children's entertainment and started being something children had to process. Yates's Half-Blood Prince is the moodier, more visually sophisticated film — the desaturated palette, the burning Burrow, the cave's Inferi. But sophistication without the shock of precedent can feel like refinement rather than revelation. The lead says the film that changed what the franchise could do outperforms the one that refined what the franchise had become.
The Numbers
| Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire | Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince | |
|---|---|---|
| Head-to-Head | 61% | 39% |
| Overall Win Rate | 56% | 40% |
| Championships | 6 | 3 |
| Avg Decision | 3.5s | 3.3s |
| Budget | $150M | $250M |
| Box Office | $896M | $934M |
Where This Matchup Sits
BingeBracket has 73 Adventure films. Both land somewhere in the middle.
Looking at shared opponents, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban stands above both of them on the platform. For all their differences, neither film can get past it.
Where to Watch
Availability may vary by region.
Want to pit Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire against something else?
Build your own bracket with any films you want.