Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire currently beats Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 58–42
The middle chapter holds off the ending.
Who do you think should win?
The Verdict Franchise Civil War
Goblet of Fire's edge means the Horntail on the rooftops and the underwater maze still generate more competitive energy than Hogwarts in ruins. Newell's single-film tenure gave Goblet a restless quality — adolescent drama one scene, genuine peril the next, the graveyard sequence landing with a weight the earlier films never attempted. Yates's finale is more assured filmmaking, but assurance reads differently than surprise. The narrow gap says Goblet's volatility is a feature, not a flaw.
The Numbers
| Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire | Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Head-to-Head | 58% | 42% |
| Overall Win Rate | 56% | 63% |
| Championships | 6 | 9 |
| Avg Decision | 3.5s | 3.4s |
| Budget | $150M | $125M |
| Box Office | $896M | $1.3B |
The broader numbers favour Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2: 63% win rate overall vs 56% for Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. This head-to-head runs against the trend.
Where This Matchup Sits
On the platform, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 sits at #7 in Fantasy out of 43.
Looking at shared opponents, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban stands above both of them on the platform. For all their differences, neither film can get past it.
It takes 4.6s to choose Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 vs 2.5s for Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. Slower doesn't mean weaker — it can mean more deliberate, more personal, harder to explain.
Where to Watch
Availability may vary by region.
Want to pit Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire against something else?
Build your own bracket with any films you want.