Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban currently beats The Conjuring 57–43
Fantasy horror edges out the haunted-house franchise.
Who do you think should win?
The Verdict Genre Clash
Cuarón's Time-Turner sequence — the camera tracking Hermione and Harry as they loop back through events the audience already watched, the earlier scenes acquiring new meaning from the new perspective — is the franchise's most structurally ambitious scene and a piece of filmmaking that Wan's more conventional haunted-house structure never attempts. The Conjuring has Wan's immaculate pacing and Vera Farmiga's committed performance. But pacing within a genre is a different achievement than reimagining a franchise's formal possibilities. The lead says reimagination outperforms perfection. Cuarón changed what Potter could be. Wan perfected what horror already was.
The Numbers
| Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban | The Conjuring | |
|---|---|---|
| Head-to-Head | 57% | 43% |
| Overall Win Rate | 65% | 39% |
| Championships | 48 | 2 |
| Avg Decision | 5.0s | 7.4s |
| Budget | $130M | $13M |
| Box Office | $790M | $321M |
Where This Matchup Sits
On the platform, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban sits at #10 in Adventure out of 74.
Elsewhere on the platform, they have a common problem — Avengers: Infinity War beats both of them. Whatever else separates these two films, they share that one loss.
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban earned $790M on a $130M budget while The Conjuring made $321M on $13M. The bracket result tracks the money — Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban wins both.
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban gets chosen fast (6.1s). The Conjuring gets chosen slowly (11.3s). Both choices are valid — they're just coming from different places.
Where to Watch
Availability may vary by region.
Want to pit Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban against something else?
Build your own bracket with any films you want.