The Texas Chainsaw Massacre currently beats Hereditary 65–35
Remake brutality edges out elevated horror.
The Verdict David vs Goliath
Nispel's sustained physical menace and Aster's grief-derived supernatural horror are opposite approaches to the genre, and voters are choosing the physical one. The Chainsaw remake's basement sequences — the meat hooks, the chase through industrial architecture, the sound design built from machinery — generate a sensory assault that Hereditary's more psychological approach deliberately trades for slower, deeper unease. Both are effective horror. The lead says the sensory assault generates stronger immediate engagement. The chainsaw is louder than the séance, and in a bracket that measures gut response, louder apparently wins.
The Numbers
| The Texas Chainsaw Massacre | Hereditary | |
|---|---|---|
| Head-to-Head | 65% | 35% |
| Overall Win Rate | 60% | 58% |
| Championships | 76 | 105 |
| Avg Decision | 1.4s | 3.1s |
| Budget | $10M | $10M |
| Box Office | $107M | $88M |
Where This Matchup Sits
In Horror on BingeBracket: The Texas Chainsaw Massacre at #8 and Hereditary is in the upper half, out of 38 films.
Against other opponents on BingeBracket, both films share a weakness: neither can beat The Exorcist.
The tournament titles favor Hereditary (105 to 76), which makes the head-to-head result all the more notable. The film with the stronger resume is losing the direct matchup.
By TMDB ratings, Hereditary should have the edge. Head-to-head, it doesn't. Whatever The Texas Chainsaw Massacre does for voters in a direct comparison, it doesn't show up in aggregate scores.
Think Hereditary deserves better?
You're in the 35%.
Play the bracket these votes came from. Your pick shifts the result.
Where to Watch
Availability may vary by region.
Want to pit The Texas Chainsaw Massacre against something else?
Build your own bracket with any films you want.