Blade Runner 2049 currently edges Sicario 54–46
The sci-fi epic pulls ahead of the border thriller.
The Verdict Director's Cut
2049 leading rewards ambition at the highest degree of difficulty. Sequels to sacred films almost always fail, and this one had no business working — yet Villeneuve and Deakins built a sequel that earns its title through sheer command of image and mood, the holographic Joi, the brutalist ruins, light used like a character. Sicario is tighter and more immediately gripping, but it operates inside a familiar genre. 2049 had to justify its own existence and did. A lead here suggests voters reward the film that attempted the impossible over the one that perfected the expected. Ground-level dread is hard. Resurrecting a masterpiece is harder.
The Numbers
| Sicario | Blade Runner 2049 | |
|---|---|---|
| Head-to-Head | 46% | 54% |
| Overall Win Rate | 44% | 49% |
| Championships | 5 | 18 |
| Avg Decision | 2.7s | 2.2s |
| Budget | $30M | $150M |
| Box Office | $85M | $259M |
Where This Matchup Sits
BingeBracket has 47 films from the 2010s. Both land somewhere in the middle.
Blade Runner 2049 is Denis Villeneuve's #4 on BingeBracket; Sicario sits at #6 out of 8.
When facing other films, both run into the same wall: Arrival beats them both on BingeBracket, regardless of how they perform against each other.
Think Sicario deserves better?
You're in the 46%.
Play the bracket these votes came from. Your pick shifts the result.
Where to Watch
Availability may vary by region.
Want to pit Blade Runner 2049 against something else?
Build your own bracket with any films you want.