The Texas Chainsaw Massacre currently dominates A Nightmare on Elm Street 100–0
Chainsaw's raw-nerve authenticity makes Elm Street's surrealism feel safe.
The Verdict David vs Goliath
Freddy Krueger became a punchline by the third sequel — wise-cracking, merchandised, defanged. Leatherface never became a punchline because there's nothing in Hooper's original film to domesticate. The dinner scene isn't witty. The chase isn't choreographed for thrills. Sally's screaming isn't performed for effect — it sounds real because the shoot was punishing enough that it nearly was. At 100 to 0 across 64 votes, the gap reflects a fundamental hierarchy: horror that resists commercial digestion outlasts horror that became a franchise. Chainsaw stayed feral. Elm Street went to Hollywood.
The Numbers
| A Nightmare on Elm Street | The Texas Chainsaw Massacre | |
|---|---|---|
| Head-to-Head | 0% | 100% |
| Overall Win Rate | 47% | 62% |
| Championships | 11 | 76 |
| Avg Decision | 1.0s | 1.1s |
| Budget | $2M | $10M |
| Return | 31.7x | 11.3x |
Where This Matchup Sits
BingeBracket tracks 38 Horror films — A Nightmare on Elm Street is in the upper half, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre at #8.
100% is the kind of margin where the conversation shifts from "who wins" to "why isn't it closer."
The championship record tells the same story: The Texas Chainsaw Massacre has 76 tournament wins to A Nightmare on Elm Street's 11. The pedigree gap matches the head-to-head gap.
Think A Nightmare on Elm Street deserves better?
You're in the 0%.
Play the bracket these votes came from. Your pick shifts the result.
Where to Watch
Availability may vary by region.
Want to pit The Texas Chainsaw Massacre against something else?
Build your own bracket with any films you want.